Just like all the other stories, the “Julius Caesar”, written by William Shakespeare, includes the following basic sections: the initial situation, the story conflict, climax, suspense and conclusive part. William Shakespeare didn’t go any other way, and made his “Julius Caesar” on the basis of typical “ingredients”.
After killing his co-leader Pompey Julius Caesar returns to Rome. The whole irony lies within fact that common people celebrate the Roman triumph of an individual instead of the whole nation. The tension feels from the first page of the page and without a doubt, something is going to happen so that the tension could be finally broken.
Conflict of the Story
Julius Caesar’s longing for an absolute power disturbs those who believe that common people ignore the possible consequences of the upcoming of Julius Caesar’s tyranny. Although Cassius exerts every effort to incite Brutus to rebel, Brutus takes no notice of it and is moved by the fact that the empire should be greater than Julius. With the fake letter in his hands, Brutus realizes how bad the things are in Rome and that he is the only savior. His patriotic feelings must be higher than personal convictions regarding Julius Caesar.
The conspirators come to an agreement that nobody should touch the Antony’s body that worries Cassius. The conspirators easily pull off the murder, nonetheless, they are hurt by naive beliefs of Brutus. He truly believes that everyone around will worship them after they state real motivations behind their deeds: that they killed Julius Caesar only to bring the better future for Rome. The nation is all in panic, which means things went really wrong. Playing with Brutus’s trust, Anthony asks him whether he can deliver his speech at the funeral. Although Antony gives his word by saying he will never lay any blame, he actually plans to have Julius avenged by provoking the common people to start a riot.
Antony’s rhetoric gives him an opportunity to highlight all the wrongs the traitors have done to Julius Caesar. This gives the people a good motivation to be angry on Julius Caesar’s behalf. They walk the streets, shouting “Kill and burn!”. The whole situation pleases Antony. whose plan turns out just perfectly.
Everyone finally “wakes up” when Brutus announces that Portia is dead. This, in turn, brings some light on how useless was Brutus in this fight. Julius Caesar’s ghost appears and Brutus, being braver than ever before, is sure to meet the ghost. Cassius sums up his life in a very poetic way – his birthday comes, so if he passes away today, this means his life have reached the full circle. Two comrades agree to never come back in chains, which means that they will commit suicide before the moment of dishonor.
When reaching up the end of the play, one sees how it all played in the world history. Cassius and Brutus commit suicide when they are sure their battle against Antony is lost. Having taken the field, where Brutus fell, Antony and Octavius proclaim him to be the noblest man. Unluckily, Brutus is a little bit too dead to know his new status and the situation doesn’t worry him anymore.
This was an example of Julius Caesar essay, written by the writers of our custom writing service. To buy an essay on the necessary topic, please, fill in the Free Inquiry form in the top right corner of this page.
Order a custom written paper from professional writer
Julius Caesar Essay: Loyalty and Justice in Julius Caesar
655 Words3 Pages
Loyalty and Justice in Julius Caesar
In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, one must read the text closely to track the shifting motivations and loyalties of each character as the play progresses. An important factor that must be kept in mind while reading is the degree of loyalty, in other words, the degree to which characters act out of a motivation to help others. Throughout the play, each character's current degree of loyalty to others is clearly exhibited by words or behavior – this holds true for the characters of Brutus, Cassius, Antony, Portia, and Calpurnia. The focus on loyalty is critical because before the play ends an even-handed justice is meted out to a number of people who fail to live up to an expected standard of…show more content…
One must engage in very close reading of the text to determine the cause and the signs of change. Issues for discussion include whether Antony is carried away by personal power, whether he is driven by desire for vengeance to assuage his personal grief, and whether these things constitute a desire to act for his friend or for himself. Antony's final speech is essentially a repeat of Brutus' rhetoric following Caesar's murder, and Antony's transformation is complete.
Cassius' loyalty line goes the other way. In the beginning he is out to set himself up in a position of power, and through Caesar's death he continues to act out of self-interest. By the end of the play, however, he has developed a sense of loyalty to Brutus and to Titinius. Brutus's pattern lies somewhere in between Antony's and Cassius's. In the beginning of the play most students feel that Brutus' loyalty is ambiguous. Although he seems loyal to Caesar, he is swayed by flattery to himself. By 2.1, when he makes the decision to participate in the murder, Brutus seems to be acting out of self-interest, though he disguises it in a rationalization of the good of the country. I find that students often engage in a really interesting discussion of the subtle shifts in Brutus' use of language; he shifts, for instance, to the use of the royal "we." By the end of the play Brutus, like Cassius, develops a sense of loyalty to his new comrades, and his last words, like Cassius's, are a self-condemning recognition of