Can Capital Punishment Be Justified? Essay
Can Capital Punishment be justified?
In this day and age it is quite common for young men to carry knives and other weapons. In spite of police campaigns to educate people against carrying weapons there has been a significant increase in the deaths of young British males. Often an argument may become heated, weapons are pulled put with tragic consequences.
As well as carrying knives it has become increasingly common, particularly in the English inner cities where the rug culture is prevalent for young, mainly black males to carry guns for reasons of status and protection. When one of their own is killed this is tragic enough but it is even more upsetting to the public at large when innocent bystanders are killed. this was highlighted by the case at new year when two innocent young teenage girls were shot in a gang shooting in England.
As the culture of carrying weapons increases, some sections of the population believe we should follow the American example of having a death penalty for murder. Although the American example has compelling evidence to support it, it would take a change in parliament's attitude before the death penalty was introduced here. The last time there was a vote on this issue in the Houses of Parliament, a majority of MP's voted against it.
However in my opinion Capital punishment is necessary in order for justice to prevail. Capital punishment is the execution of criminals for committing crimes, regarded so bad that this is the only acceptable punishment. Capital punishment lowers the murder rate, but its value as retribution alone is a good reason for handing out death sentences. It is one of the only fair punishments allowed by the judicial system. Another issue is that it saves money compared to the alternative of life in prison.
The death penalty deters murder and prevents murderers from killing again by putting the fear of death in to would be killers. A person is less likely to do something, if he or she thinks that harm will come to him. Another way the death penalty may help deter murder is the fact that if the killer is death, he or she will not be able to kill again....
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
Can Crime Control be Justified? Essay1341 words - 5 pages Over time, our nation has swung the balance towards the crime control model and thus puts more and more emphasis on the reduction of street level crime. Street level crime consists of everything from burglary, rape, and all types of drug felonies. These crimes cost American people millions of dollars a year, whether it is in direct effect from a crime or it has to do with the after affects of a crime.With the increase of the assembly...
Can Euthanasia Be Justified Morally? Essay1152 words - 5 pages Is the choice of individuals to end their lives dependent on anyone else but themselves? Or should a jury or the state truly have the omnipotent voice in such a personal endeavour? Ethics can be elucidated as a set of moral principles, thusly the rules of conduct perceived by one or a society to be the right or wrong, the good or bad (as religiously termed evil). Several philosophers throughout history have attempted to define the term...
Should Capital Punishment be Legal?606 words - 2 pages We supposedly live in a civilized society and yet certain states in America still believe in the most brutal and barbaric method of punishment, capital punishment. Also known as the death penalty, capital punishment is the most severe form of corporal punishment because it requires law enforcement officers to kill the offender. It has been banned in many...
Capital Punishment Must Be Abolished4184 words - 17 pages The death penalty is not the most effective form of punishment for criminals. The death penalty is hypocritical; it condemns killing by killing people. Many supporters of capital punishment cite retribution as being a justification for the death penalty; however, no matter what the circumstance, murder is never justified. Ghandi once said “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” Two wrongs can never make a right. Capital punishment should...
Capital Punishment Must Be Abolished1321 words - 5 pages Capital punishment is used to bring justice to the crimes of murderers in our society, but is it really just? Studies show that the death penalty is cruel, morally wrong, and sometimes painful. It robs the criminal and the public of their humanity and undermines the value of life. The public should come to realize the cruelty of this law, and this form of punishment should be abolished from the government's criminal justice system. ...
Should Capital Punishment Be Legal?1323 words - 5 pages Capital punishment is a very controversial issue today. There are good statements made on both sides of the argument. A couple of questions should be asked before deciding which side to take in the never ending debate of capital punishment. Is capital punishment a cruel and unusual way of punishing serious offenders? Should the mentally ill be susceptible to capital punishment? A lot of states made capital punishment legal, but not all of them...
Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished1167 words - 5 pages More than 18,000 Americans have been executed since the creation of the death penalty in colonial times (University of Alabama). The sentence of death for the punishment of a murder in the United States has declined in recent years. In 2014, the number of new death sentences was 72, the lowest level in many decades. Unfortunately, the U.S. fails to recognize capital punishment as a profound human rights violation and as a frightening abuse of...
Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished1157 words - 5 pages Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished Capital punishment is a brutal antiquated concept that must be abolished in the name of civilised society. Each year in just America, the land of freedom + the just, 650 people r added 2 the death row + 105 r executed. The death penalty is the harshest form of punishment in the world...
Should Capital Punishment be abolished?595 words - 2 pages Capital PunishmentDeath is the one penalty that makes error irreversible and should not be considered as the ultimate punishment for inmates. Capital Punishment, also known as the death penalty, has been proven statistically to be an awful and wrongful death to many who have been executed; therefore, execution by lethal injection...
Capital Punishment Should be Terminated1626 words - 7 pages The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is exactly how it sounds. The convicted is sentence to death because of the heinous crimes they have committed by the legal process. “Most death penalty cases involve the execution of murderers although capital punishment can also be applied for treason, espionage, and other crimes” (ProCon, 2014, para1). The eighth amendment protects people from excessive bail, excessive fines imposed, or...
Research Essay: Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified?1588 words - 6 pages Research Essay: Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified? “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.“ This is a popular quote regarding the state of terrorism, and how certain people may consider terrorism justifiable. Justifying terrorism is, however, not different from justifying innocent slaughter. Justifying innocent slaughter suggests that terrorists believe that political or religious conflicts are more prominent than a segment of...
Criminals should all be set free
How can a side that argues that criminals don't deserve to die because they would suffer, not recognize that imprisonment, and rehabilitation are just as cruel?
When you send criminal to prison or put him on probation as a society, temporary or not, you deprive him of freedom of association, limit his access to the world, and cause him suffering by forcing our revenge upon the criminal. Did Jesus not say turn the other cheek?
The only moral way to deal with criminals is to appeal to there better side, run, defend our selves (only as needed to stop the crime.)
How does being secure by incarcerating and causing suffering to others, not make us any worse? It's not that they are innocent, it is just that we have no right to harm them in return, its the same reason we don't cheer any more for the kid who strikes back at the bully who assaults him, he is just as evil as his oppressor when he lowers himself, and so are we. The death penalty is only this tenfold.
Legalised murder -taking of another life in this way is inhumane
No-one is entirely good or bad-saintly or evil we are a mixture of both. So when a person commits horrendous and unthinkable crimes against another or others then I believe there is hope of redemption. There are times that we must forgive a person or people their wrong doings to bring peace to ourselves. It is not acceptable also when a person has been executed for this to be seen as a celebration- what does this say about them -are they rejoicing that justice has been served or that a person has had their life ended prematurely because they made a mistake or wrong choice which being a human being we are all inclined to do- no-one is immune from this. It gives me no comfort when I witness this as they are condoning ending a life with such ease and that in itself shows moral corruption and it is exactly this as to why capital punishment should not be carried out- it festers away at our ability to forgive and move on and replaces it with bitterness, hatred and contempt for our less fortunate members of society who are the most in need of our support and understanding.
It's Too Late?
Killing someone for killing other people is both hypocritical and unjust. Maybe seeing the person who killed someone you know and love would give you peace, but it won't bring them back. Not to mention, maybe the prosecuted has a family as well. Does anyone think about them? Offer comfort and condolences? No. They throw them from society, saying they were close to a murderer and are just as bad. Plus, crimes are acts of revenge. Revenge isn't without reason. And no one ever asks what that reason is before it's too late.
It can't satisfy anybody's conscience.
It is quite simple to say that a person(perpetrator) who is supposed to be hang is justified but will it satisfy anybody's conscience? Will it put an end to that type of crime? The answer to that is a big NO. Take, for example, a terrorist being hanged for killing people. He might be deserving that simply considering the severity of the crime, but it will not bring the crime to an end, which should be our main agenda.
It undermines principles of criminal rehabilitation.
One of the primary aims of the criminal justice system is to attempt to rehabilitate the criminal in order to both prevent the repetition of the crime by that individual, and to improve the life of that criminal. It is unjustified to take a life for a mistake they made.
Not a right thing to do
The cost to pay for executions is too high, for example from the Report of the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice (2008):
“The additional cost of confining an inmate to death row, as compared to the maximum security prisons where those sentenced to life without possibility of parole ordinarily serve their sentences, is $90,000 per year per inmate. With California’s current death row population of 670, that accounts for $63.3 million annually.” That is too high of an amount of money. Not to mention that this goes against almost every religion. However, there are some cases where life in prison is not acceptable for the crime the inmate has committed. In those few cases the death penitently should be allowed, but not as much as it has been going on.
In the case of Korea, there are about 60 death-row criminals waiting to die. But there has been no capital punishment that has been enforced in past 14 years. Nevertheless, being sentenced death and yet still living can actually be more painful than a death. Everyday, death-row criminals wake up in fear if the day has came. Every time they are called out of their cells for whatever reason, they suffer fear of death since it can be their call for the injection. Maybe making their life so miserable this way is in fact a better "eye for an eye".
Since the government has decided that the person being sentenced to death cannot experience cruel or unusual punishment, there is no punishment to dieing instantly with no pain. Rotting in prison for the rest of their life is much more punishment than being taken out of this world in an instant.
Killing a person to show that killing another person is wrong does not even make sense?? It is really hypocritical. The death penalty financial cost is also very high we pay more to kill a person than to keep them in jail. Who knew death was more expensive than life?
If some one kills some one they die what about the person that killed them they would died too and then it would never stop until everyone is dead. So I oppose this. It should not be justified.If a person is on trial for murder, then they are on trial for taking a life that is not theirs to take. Sending a person to death row is the same thing. A persons life does not belong to the government, therefore it should not be the courts decision whether a person lives or not. Also, taking a murderer's life does not bring back the death of the victim, nor does it justify it. Instead of the death penalty (for any crime committed), the criminal should be given the appropriate number of years sentence, which would depend on the intensity of the crime, along with the appropriate amount of counseling throughout the sentence.